Duplicate MRP message handling and test

[pan-apple]

Problem

If the MRP ack is lost, the retransmitted MRP message doesn't trigger an ack. The message counter check detects the retransmitted message as duplicate, and drops it before it could reach MRP layer.

Change overview

Detect and mark the message as duplicate. If the message requires MRP ack, let it go up the stack to the MRP layer.
The MRP and exchange layer sends the ack for the message, and drops it.

Testing

Added a new unit test CheckDuplicateMessage to test this condition.
Also tested E2E flow using Python controller and chip-tool apps.

[pan-apple]

Fixes #7292

[pan-apple]

/rebase

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "gn_qpg6100-example-build" from 17dbc19

File	Section	File	VM
chip-qpg6100-lighting-example.out	.text	-40	-40

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-qpg6100-lighting-example.out and ./pull_artifact/chip-qpg6100-lighting-example.out:

sections,vmsize,filesize
.debug_info,0,1932
.debug_loc,0,184
[Unmapped],0,40
.shstrtab,0,1
.debug_ranges,0,-8
.text,-40,-40
.debug_aranges,0,-56
.debug_abbrev,0,-64
.debug_line,0,-91
.symtab,0,-128
.debug_frame,0,-148
.debug_str,0,-149
.strtab,0,-253

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-qpg6100-lighting-example.out.map and ./pull_artifact/chip-qpg6100-lighting-example.out.map:

BLOAT EXECUTION FAILED WITH CODE 1:
bloaty: unknown file type for file './pull_artifact/chip-qpg6100-lighting-example.out.map'

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "esp32-example-build" from 17dbc19

File	Section	File	VM
chip-all-clusters-app.elf	.flash.text	60	60
chip-all-clusters-app.elf	.flash.rodata	-80	-80

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-pigweed-app.elf and ./pull_artifact/chip-pigweed-app.elf:

sections,vmsize,filesize

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-all-clusters-app.elf and ./pull_artifact/chip-all-clusters-app.elf:

sections,vmsize,filesize
.debug_info,0,2292
.debug_line,0,137
.debug_loc,0,125
.debug_ranges,0,112
[Unmapped],0,80
.flash.text,60,60
.xt.lit._ZN4chip16BitMapObjectPoolINS_9Messaging15ExchangeContextELj8EE12CreateObjectIJPNS1_15ExchangeManagerEtRNS_19SecureSessionHandleEbRPNS1_16ExchangeDelegateEEEEPS2_DpOT_,0,40
.xt.lit._ZNK4chip9Transport11PeerAddress8ToStringEPcj,0,40
.xt.prop._ZN4chip16BitMapObjectPoolINS_9Messaging15ExchangeContextELj8EE12CreateObjectIJPNS1_15ExchangeManagerEtRNS_19SecureSessionHandleEbRPNS1_16ExchangeDelegateEEEEPS2_DpOT_,0,40
[1 Others],0,1
.debug_aranges,0,-16
.xt.prop._ZN4chip9Messaging15ExchangeManagerD0Ev,0,-24
.xt.prop._ZN4chip9Messaging15ExchangeManagerD2Ev,0,-24
.xt.prop._ZN4chip9Transport19PeerConnectionStateC5Ev,0,-40
.debug_abbrev,0,-61
.symtab,0,-64
.flash.rodata,-80,-80
.xt.lit._ZN4chip9Transport19PeerConnectionStateC5Ev,0,-80
.debug_frame,0,-120
.debug_str,0,-145
.strtab,0,-253

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "nrfconnect-example-build" from 17dbc19

File	Section	File	VM
chip-shell.elf	text	76	76
chip-shell.elf	device_handles	4	4
chip-shell.elf	rodata	-72	-76
chip-lock.elf	text	76	76
chip-lock.elf	device_handles	4	4
chip-lock.elf	rodata	-72	-76

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-shell.elf and ./pull_artifact/chip-shell.elf:

sections,vmsize,filesize
.debug_info,0,681
.debug_loc,0,168
text,76,76
.debug_ranges,0,40
device_handles,4,4
.shstrtab,0,1
.debug_aranges,0,-56
.debug_line,0,-65
rodata,-76,-72
.symtab,0,-96
.debug_abbrev,0,-100
.debug_frame,0,-156
.debug_str,0,-184
.strtab,0,-293

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-lock.elf and ./pull_artifact/chip-lock.elf:

sections,vmsize,filesize
.debug_info,0,1969
.debug_loc,0,164
text,76,76
.debug_ranges,0,40
device_handles,4,4
.shstrtab,0,1
.debug_line,0,-48
.debug_aranges,0,-56
.debug_abbrev,0,-65
rodata,-76,-72
.symtab,0,-96
.debug_str,0,-144
.debug_frame,0,-148
.strtab,0,-253

[pan-apple]

@saurabhst, @mspang any feedback?

[mspang]

rubber stamping @yufengwangca's review