TC-IDM-10.2: checks for non-spec clusters #33695
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There are a number of clusters that appear in the spec adoc but are ifdef'd. These were not caught by the original provisional cluster checks. The following do not appear in the codegen and will therefore be caught in the IDM-10.1 test if they appear in cert (check that all clusters in the standard range have known IDs). These are therefore not included in the specific check. 0x0094 Water Heater Management 0x0095 Energy Price 0x009A Energy Calendar 0x009E Water Heater Mode 0x0450 Network Identity Management The following DOES appear in the 1.3-SVE codegen and are therefore checked explicitly: 0x0096 Demand Response and Load Control The following appears in the master codegen, but is not included in the 1.3-sve branch and will therefore fail the 10.1 test: 0x0451 WiFi Network Management There are also some completely non-spec clusters that appear in the codegen, but not in the spec at all. They appear to be zigbee only clusters. These are added to the new checks: 0x0007 On/off Switch Configuration 0x000F Binary Input (Basic) 0x0103 Barrier Control 0x0B04 Electrical Measurement In all cases, inclusion of these clusters on a device at cert SHOULD cause a failure in the PICS checker test as there is no way to specify these clusters in the PICS, but a definite check here is also beneficial.
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andy31415,
andyg-apple,
anush-apple,
arkq,
bauerschwan,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
cliffamzn,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
fessehaeve,
harimau-qirex,
harsha-rajendran,
hawk248,
hicklin,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
jmeg-sfy,
joonhaengHeo,
jtung-apple,
kiel-apple and
kkasperczyk-no
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
nivi-apple,
p0fi,
pidarped,
plauric,
rcasallas-silabs,
robszewczyk,
saurabhst,
selissia,
sharadb-amazon,
tecimovic,
tehampson,
tima-q,
tobiasgraf,
turon,
vivien-apple,
wiba-nordic,
woody-apple,
younghak-hwang,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
bzbarsky-apple
approved these changes
Jun 1, 2024
|
PR #33695: Size comparison from b790232 to 30382e2 Increases (24 builds for efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, stm32)
Decreases (64 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cyw30739, efr32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, qpg, stm32, telink)
Full report (83 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
arkq
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
cecille
added a commit
to cecille/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
* TC-IDM-10.2: checks for non-spec clusters There are a number of clusters that appear in the spec adoc but are ifdef'd. These were not caught by the original provisional cluster checks. The following do not appear in the codegen and will therefore be caught in the IDM-10.1 test if they appear in cert (check that all clusters in the standard range have known IDs). These are therefore not included in the specific check. 0x0094 Water Heater Management 0x0095 Energy Price 0x009A Energy Calendar 0x009E Water Heater Mode 0x0450 Network Identity Management The following DOES appear in the 1.3-SVE codegen and are therefore checked explicitly: 0x0096 Demand Response and Load Control The following appears in the master codegen, but is not included in the 1.3-sve branch and will therefore fail the 10.1 test: 0x0451 WiFi Network Management There are also some completely non-spec clusters that appear in the codegen, but not in the spec at all. They appear to be zigbee only clusters. These are added to the new checks: 0x0007 On/off Switch Configuration 0x000F Binary Input (Basic) 0x0103 Barrier Control 0x0B04 Electrical Measurement In all cases, inclusion of these clusters on a device at cert SHOULD cause a failure in the PICS checker test as there is no way to specify these clusters in the PICS, but a definite check here is also beneficial. * Restyled by autopep8 * Restyled by isort * missed removing wifi in the test itself --------- Co-authored-by: Restyled.io <[email protected]>
andy31415
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2024
…nch. (#33885) * TC-IDM-10.2: Add test for provisional clusters (#33361) * TC-IDM-10.2: Add test for provisional clusters * Restyled by autopep8 * Un-hard-code IDs * Add content control to the init file so we can use the ID * Add some more provisional clusters * Restyled by autopep8 * Restyled by isort * Add in a couple more provisional from main spec * it's nice to add ALL the changes before uploading --------- Co-authored-by: Restyled.io <[email protected]> * TC-IDM-10.2: checks for non-spec clusters (#33695) * TC-IDM-10.2: checks for non-spec clusters There are a number of clusters that appear in the spec adoc but are ifdef'd. These were not caught by the original provisional cluster checks. The following do not appear in the codegen and will therefore be caught in the IDM-10.1 test if they appear in cert (check that all clusters in the standard range have known IDs). These are therefore not included in the specific check. 0x0094 Water Heater Management 0x0095 Energy Price 0x009A Energy Calendar 0x009E Water Heater Mode 0x0450 Network Identity Management The following DOES appear in the 1.3-SVE codegen and are therefore checked explicitly: 0x0096 Demand Response and Load Control The following appears in the master codegen, but is not included in the 1.3-sve branch and will therefore fail the 10.1 test: 0x0451 WiFi Network Management There are also some completely non-spec clusters that appear in the codegen, but not in the spec at all. They appear to be zigbee only clusters. These are added to the new checks: 0x0007 On/off Switch Configuration 0x000F Binary Input (Basic) 0x0103 Barrier Control 0x0B04 Electrical Measurement In all cases, inclusion of these clusters on a device at cert SHOULD cause a failure in the PICS checker test as there is no way to specify these clusters in the PICS, but a definite check here is also beneficial. * Restyled by autopep8 * Restyled by isort * missed removing wifi in the test itself --------- Co-authored-by: Restyled.io <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Restyled.io <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are a number of clusters that appear in the spec adoc but are ifdef'd. These were not caught by the original provisional cluster checks.
The following do not appear in the codegen and will therefore be caught in the IDM-10.1 test if they appear in cert (check that all clusters in the standard range have known IDs). These are therefore not included in the specific check.
0x0094 Water Heater Management
0x0095 Energy Price
0x009A Energy Calendar
0x009E Water Heater Mode
0x0450 Network Identity Management
The following DOES appear in the 1.3-SVE codegen and are therefore checked explicitly:
0x0096 Demand Response and Load Control
The following appears in the master codegen, but is not included in the 1.3-sve branch and will therefore fail the 10.1 test: 0x0451 WiFi Network Management
There are also some completely non-spec clusters that appear in the codegen, but not in the spec at all. They appear to be zigbee only clusters. These are added to the new checks:
0x0007 On/off Switch Configuration
0x000F Binary Input (Basic)
0x0103 Barrier Control
0x0B04 Electrical Measurement
In all cases, inclusion of these clusters on a device at cert SHOULD cause a failure in the PICS checker test as there is no way to specify these clusters in the PICS, but a definite check here is also beneficial.