Remove deprecated Nessie basic authentication type

[agrawalreetika]

Description

Remove deprecated Nessie basic authentication type

Motivation and Context

Remove deprecated Nessie basic authentication type
https://projectnessie.org/tools/client_config/#authentication-settings
https://github.com/projectnessie/nessie/blob/nessie-0.59.0/api/client/src/main/java/org/projectnessie/client/NessieConfigConstants.java#L34

Impact

None

Test Plan

NA

Contributor checklist

• Please make sure your submission complies with our development, formatting, commit message, and attribution guidelines.
• PR description addresses the issue accurately and concisely. If the change is non-trivial, a GitHub Issue is referenced.
• Documented new properties (with its default value), SQL syntax, functions, or other functionality.
• If release notes are required, they follow the release notes guidelines.
• Adequate tests were added if applicable.
• CI passed.

Release Notes

== NO RELEASE NOTE ==

[github-actions]

Codenotify: Notifying subscribers in CODENOTIFY files for diff 048672d...a46dffe.

Notify	File(s)
@steveburnett	presto-docs/src/main/sphinx/connector/iceberg.rst

[steveburnett]

LGTM! (docs)

Local build of docs, everything looks good.

[yingsu00]

@agrawalreetika I think we should allow the user to have some grace period before the basic auth type is removed. Let's just mark @deprecated on these properties for now and update the doc.

[agrawalreetika]

@agrawalreetika I think we should allow the user to have some grace period before the basic auth type is removed. Let's just mark @deprecated on these properties for now and update the doc.

Sure @yingsu00, then I will add one more commit about deprecation in this #21399 and we can keep this one for merging later. Would that work?

[yingsu00]

@agrawalreetika I think we should allow the user to have some grace period before the basic auth type is removed. Let's just mark @deprecated on these properties for now and update the doc.

Sure @yingsu00, then I will add one more commit about deprecation in this #21399 and we can keep this one for merging later. Would that work?

Yes that works! After it's done can you please archive this PR?

[agrawalreetika]

Closing in favour of #21476