Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
React's type seems to be
ReactNode
, rather thanReactNode[]
(which they do use elsewhere). AsComponentChildren
isComponentChild | ComponentChild[]
, I'm not quite sure this change is correct.Does this work correctly in React? It's very possible we have an issue elsewhere in the types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well, yes and no:
ReactNode
is an alias ofComponentChild
but does not includeIterable<ComponentChild>
like reactsReactNode
does does and simply extending that union inpreact/compat
only isn't possible the way it's written currently. I thought this is the minimal change but I agree, imho the correct change would be to dropComponentChildren
, renameComponentChild
toPreactNode
and includeIterable<PreactNode>
in it. But that's not exactly a small change...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't support iterables, the type is correct there FWIW.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wdym "we don't support iterables"? You have arrays in your types, arrays are iterables? Or did you mean
PreactNode[]
instead ofIterable<PreactNode>
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as for "does this work correctly in react" - well, it's a type change? Ofc react still works. And if you're using react (not preact) then this issue wouldn't arise in the first place?
Kinda confused what you mean to say here... changing this solves the described issue and doesn't break anything else in the rather large project that I'm currently migrating from react to preact, so... yes? It works in a "react like context"?
EDIT: ah, you probably meant "does the issue above arise in react" - no, it doesn't probably because
ReactNode
includes iterables.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Arrays are iterable, but not all iterables are arrays;
Map
,Set
,Uint32Array
, and other structures are iterable too.I'm asking if your type (for your component) works in React -- I've always used
ReactNode[]
/ComponentChildren
for multiple nodes, personally.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it does, we're using this heavily throughout multiple large projects and never had any problems until we migrated to preact (which we did because react is basically incompatible with CEs and probably will continue to be)