Update CODE_OF_CONDUCT to include LLM transparency#3
Merged
JoviDeCroock merged 2 commits intomasterfrom Nov 21, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Added a section on transparency regarding the use of LLMs in issue and pull request submissions.
This was referenced Nov 21, 2025
JoviDeCroock
added a commit
to preactjs/preact
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2025
Looks like our global one can then take presedence once preactjs/.github#3 is merged
| * Focusing on what is best for the community | ||
| * Showing empathy towards other community members | ||
|
|
||
| We recognize that LLM's have become an integral tool for many users, however when using LLMs to help write issues or pull requests, disclose this. Transparency preserves the collaborative integrity that makes open-source communities work. It's the difference between "I used AI to help structure this bug report" (honest, helpful) and silently passing off generated content as your own analysis (deceptive, counterproductive). We as maintainers want to engage with humans rather than LLM-generated messages, put time in your issue report and that will be reflected back. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure that this is enforceable in practice. Wondering if we should rephrase it as something along the lines of:
"Be mindful of maintainers time. When using LLM's to create issues, double check that the content is not hallucinated and matches reality."
Would love to hear @rschristian 's perspective too.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The fact that this in there is ample reason to close issues like the signals one. I think it is enforceable and other repos seem to be doing it as well
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's enforceable enough. At the end of the day we can already close issues for any arbitrary reason, this just gives a little extra backing when/if we do so.
Co-authored-by: Marvin Hagemeister <hello@marvinh.dev>
marvinhagemeister
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2025
rschristian
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added a section on transparency regarding the use of LLMs in issue and pull request submissions.