Update BountyDepositBase on Asset Hub Polkadot and Kusama#1132
Closed
dhirajs0 wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
Update BountyDepositBase on Asset Hub Polkadot and Kusama#1132dhirajs0 wants to merge 4 commits into
BountyDepositBase on Asset Hub Polkadot and Kusama#1132dhirajs0 wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Closing this PR as I have raised another PR here: #1134 to the 2603 release branch( oty-2603) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Update the
BountyDepositBaseparameter forpallet_bountieson both Asset Hub Polkadot and Asset Hub Kusama to use explicit currency values that better reflect the economic significance of a bounty proposal.system_para_deposit(0, 176)->10 * DOLLARS(10 DOT)system_para_deposit(0, 176)->10 * QUID(~0.33 KSM)Motivation
The previous deposit was derived from
system_para_deposit(0, 176), which only accounted for byte-level storage cost and passed0for theitemsparameter. Since bounty proposals are significant governance actions that request treasury funds, the deposit should reflect that weight -- similar to howSubmissionDepositfor referenda is set to a meaningful fixed value (10 DOT) rather than being purely storage-derived.Setting
BountyDepositBaseto a fixed value aligns with the pattern used by other governance deposits on Asset Hub and ensures the deposit is proportional to the action being taken. The deposit is fully returned to the proposer when the bounty is approved, so legitimate users are not penalized.Context
close_bountybyRejectOriginslashes the bond into Treasury).SubmissionDeposit = 10 * DOLLARSfor referenda), so this change follows the same convention.