-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The osgQtQuick project source code does not contain license text #11
Comments
@pm-energid started this discussion on another #10 issue. I propose to continue the discussion here. Сс: @robertosfield |
I agree that LGPL is quite appropriate for this library. However, with the missing license file, the users can easily miss/forget to display the license from this library. So, the license file should be included with the source code. Just add the license file to the develop branch. |
Just sent a pull request #12 for the license file commit |
Closed by #12. |
osg shadow qml wrapper Closes podsvirov#11 See merge request energid/osgqtquick!10
osg shadow qml wrapper Closes podsvirov#11 See merge request energid/osgqtquick!10 (cherry picked from commit 9d1a97e) 7a30081 ENHANCEMENT: 1) added few shadow wrapper classes for osgShadow classes.
…ssues_on_' into 'master' Merge from energid/osgqtquick#11 caused build issues on non-windows platforms Closes podsvirov#13 and podsvirov#11 See merge request energid/osgqtquick!13
I'm not well versed in licensing issues. The osgQtQuick project is developed on the basis of OpenSceneGraph and Qt projects.
It seems to me that LGPLv2.1 licensing is appropriate in the general case, but, maybe, there are exceptions.
I just want the project to be useful.
I will be grateful if someone will help me on this matter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: