[release-1.11] CVE-2025-65637 Logrus#2789
Conversation
mtrmac
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM but lint is unhappy, does go mod tidy help?
|
Thought I had tidied, but I will try again. |
Bump sirupsen/logrus to v1.9.3 to address CVE-2025-65637 Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-67731, https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-67898, https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-68038, https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-135829, https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-135814 Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
As the title says! Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
8f61f56 to
71a153a
Compare
|
@mtrmac looks like I missed a and the solution was to do this instead:
But I'm not sure where the 1.16 is coming from as the go.mod file has 1.17.... Thoughts? Anyway, I went with Go's suggestion and repushed. The only change I could see was that the entries for logrus in go.sum had different hashes. |
|
and logrus is also apparently using Go 1.17. I thought that might be the answer. |
and IIRC there was a fairly significant change to the mechanism/semantics between 1.16 and 1.17. Anyway we have no reason to support consuming this module via Go 1.16. |
Bump sirupsen/logrus to v1.9.3 to address CVE-2025-65637
Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-67731,
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-67898,
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-68038,
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-135829,
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-135814