Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
NIP-03: explain why a single attestation is recommended.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
fiatjaf committed Nov 18, 2023
1 parent b5b46b6 commit 7aa751b
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion 03.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ This NIP defines an event with `kind:1040` that can contain an [OpenTimestamps](
```

- The OpenTimestamps proof MUST prove the referenced `e` event id as its digest.
- The `content` MUST be the full content of an `.ots` file containing at least one Bitcoin attestation. This file SHOULD contain a **single** Bitcoin attestation and no reference to "pending" attestations since they are useless in this context.
- The `content` MUST be the full content of an `.ots` file containing at least one Bitcoin attestation. This file SHOULD contain a **single** Bitcoin attestation (as not more than one valid attestation is necessary and less bytes is better than more) and no reference to "pending" attestations since they are useless in this context.

### Example OpenTimestamps proof verification flow

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 7aa751b

Please sign in to comment.