All clear
All clear
Details
Note
Your check run agent prompt is: .macroscope/check-run-agents/effect-service-conventions.md
More information about how Check Run Agents work can be found in our Help Center.
🔍 Agent activity — reasoning, no tool calls
💭 I'm reviewing the import conventions for this module. The question is whether to use a named import or namespace import for
CommandAvailabilityfrom the shell package subpath. Since this is a utility module rather than a service module, and we're only importing a single tag, a named import seems more appropriate here. Looking at the test setup, providing the service as a layer seam is legitimate. The redundancy of yieldingCommandAvailabilityand then re-providing it withEffect.provideServiceis harmless but worth noting — since it has a default value, this pattern works but could potentially be streamlined. The named import pattern aligns with the repo's conventions for this shared utilities module.CommandAvailabilityis a Context.Reference that returns an Effect requiring FileSystem and Path dependencies, so usingyield* CommandAvailabilitycorrectly acquires it from the environment. Providing the service withEffect.provideService(CommandAvailability, commandAvailable)follows the expected pattern, and the test setup appears to be usingLayer.succe
Agent Credits: 83 credits