Skip to content

fix(desktop): preserve WSL runtime installation errors - #21658

Merged
juliusmarminge merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
desktop-app-03/wsl-install-diagnostics
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

juliusmarminge merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
desktop-app-03/wsl-install-diagnostics

fix(desktop): preserve WSL runtime installation errors

ab1b832
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
MacroscopeApp / Macroscope - Effect Service Conventions succeeded Oct 19, 2026 in 1m 21s

All clear

All clear

Details

Warning

  • Invalid effort level "max" in front matter. Fell back to "low". Valid values are: low, medium, high.

Note

Your check run agent prompt is: .macroscope/check-run-agents/effect-service-conventions.md
More information about how Check Run Agents work can be found in our Help Center.

Reviewed all 2 changed files (no prior completed review)


🔍 Agent activity — 10 tool calls

💭 Inspecting context for relevance I'm thinking about needing to look over the relevant lines and the context of the tests. It feels crucial to ensure I'm addressing everything accurately. I wonder what specific details I should focus on to make sure I cover all necessary aspects. Let's take it step by step to ensure I understand everything before providing a response. I want to make sure I get this right for the user!

1. browse_code — apps/desktop/src/backend/DesktopBackendConfiguration.ts

2. browse_code — apps/desktop/src/wsl/DesktopWslEnvironment.ts

3. browse_code — apps/desktop/src/{backend,wsl}/*.test.ts

4. browse_code — In apps/desktop/src/backend/DesktopBackendConfiguration.test.ts and apps/desktop/src/wsl/DesktopWslEnvironment.test.ts identify focused regression tests for failed WSL runtime installation preserving diagnostic and shell installer stderr, and whether they mock core business logic or use service test layers. Brief answer with locations.

5. browse_code — Are the DesktopBackendConfiguration WSL tests using mocked core business logic, or just test layers for external services? Specifically describe the harness stubs at lines 212-236 and how they relate to conventions.

6. browse_code — Is the stagedFailure optional runtimeId modification introducing any Effect service conventions violation beyond backend behavior test requirement? Focus on changed lines only.

7. browse_code — Any convention violations in changed shell script lines 277,288 of DesktopWslEnvironment.ts? concise.

8. browse_code — Does anything else affect the no-findings decision?

9. browse_code — Confirm no issue requiring inline review comment for Effect service conventions on this PR.

10. browse_code — Give final verdict in one line.


Agent Credits: 32 credits

Token usage: 72 uncached input · 571,622 cache-read input · 61,322 cache-write input · 2,930 output
Agent Credits may also include non-token charges from external tools such as web research.