OWNERS_ALIASES: replace Benjamin2037 with bb7133

[wuhuizuo]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #70419

Problem Summary:

Replace member Benjamin2037 with bb7133 in OWNERS_ALIASES, deduplicating members within each SIG. sig-community-* entries are left untouched (they are synced from pingcap/community).

What changed and how does it work?

• OWNERS_ALIASES: Benjamin2037 -> bb7133 in all SIGs except sig-community-*; removed duplicate bb7133 entries where the same SIG already listed it.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The OWNERS_ALIASES file replaces Benjamin2037 with bb7133 in approver lists for twelve TiDB component aliases.

Changes

OWNERS alias maintenance

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Approver alias replacements OWNERS_ALIASES	The approver lists for distsql, lightning, ddl, disttask, dumpling, infoschema, meta, owner, resourcemanager, table, lock, and tidb-binlog replace Benjamin2037 with bb7133.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• pingcap/tidb#70404: Updates OWNERS_ALIASES with broader ownership-rule synchronization.
• pingcap/tidb#70405: Updates OWNERS_ALIASES with broader approver membership synchronization.
• pingcap/tidb#70406: Synchronizes OWNERS_ALIASES between branches.

Poem

A rabbit checks the owners’ list,
bb7133 hops where names once missed.
Twelve aliases now point the way,
Approvers ready for review today.
Carrot cheers and code stays neat!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change by identifying the alias replacement in OWNERS_ALIASES.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description includes the issue number, problem summary, implementation details, test rationale, side effects, documentation, and release note.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch update-owner-aliases-bb7133-release-7.1

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[bb7133]

LGTM. Verified the scoped OWNERS_ALIASES identity replacement and per-SIG deduplication; sig-community aliases are untouched.

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2026-08-11 03:38:05.78746741 +0000 UTC m=+3104071.823562466: ☑️ agreed by bb7133.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bb7133

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [bb7133]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

@wuhuizuo: You cannot manually add or delete the reviewing state labels, only I and the tursted members have permission to do so.

Details

In response to adding label named lgtm.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.