-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: skip all system tables when collecting prediction columns #53443
Conversation
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔢 Self-check (PR reviewed by myself and ready for feedback.)
@@ -120,6 +120,36 @@ func MockInfoSchema(tbList []*model.TableInfo) InfoSchema { | |||
bucketIdx := tableBucketIdx(tb.ID) | |||
result.sortedTablesBuckets[bucketIdx] = append(result.sortedTablesBuckets[bucketIdx], tbl) | |||
} | |||
// Add a system table. | |||
tables := []*model.TableInfo{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should find a better way to add a system table. But right now, we only need one system table. So I guess this way is OK. But if you have any suggestions please feel free to comment.
/retest |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #53443 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.5268% 74.7824% +2.2556%
================================================
Files 1505 1505
Lines 429830 431775 +1945
================================================
+ Hits 311742 322892 +11150
+ Misses 98799 88976 -9823
- Partials 19289 19907 +618
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei, time-and-fate, winoros, zimulala The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #53403
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
We shouldn't collect stats usage for system tables. So in this PR, we do a check before we add them to the column map.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.