Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expression: implement vectorized evaluation for 'builtinNameConstRealSig' #12642

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 14, 2019
Merged

expression: implement vectorized evaluation for 'builtinNameConstRealSig' #12642

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 14, 2019

Conversation

tsthght
Copy link
Contributor

@tsthght tsthght commented Oct 12, 2019

What problem does this PR solve?

Implement vectorized evaluation for builtinNameConstRealSig, for #12105

What is changed and how it works?

BenchmarkVectorizedBuiltinMiscellaneousCasesFunc/builtinNameConstRealSig-VecBuiltinFunc-8         	20000000	       119 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkVectorizedBuiltinMiscellaneousCasesFunc/builtinNameConstRealSig-NonVecBuiltinFunc-8      	  100000	     22142 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

@sre-bot sre-bot added the contribution This PR is from a community contributor. label Oct 12, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #12642 into master will increase coverage by 0.051%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             master     #12642       +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage   79.9008%   79.9519%   +0.051%     
===============================================
  Files           461        461               
  Lines        103940     104135      +195     
===============================================
+ Hits          83049      83258      +209     
+ Misses        14788      14769       -19     
- Partials       6103       6108        +5

Copy link
Contributor

@SunRunAway SunRunAway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SunRunAway SunRunAway added component/expression status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Oct 12, 2019
@qw4990 qw4990 added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Oct 14, 2019
qw4990
qw4990 previously approved these changes Oct 14, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@qw4990 qw4990 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@qw4990 qw4990 added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Oct 14, 2019
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Oct 14, 2019

Your auto merge job has been accepted, waiting for 12657, 12658, 12659, 12641

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Oct 14, 2019

/run-all-tests

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Oct 14, 2019

/run-integration-common-test

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu removed their request for review October 14, 2019 06:09
@qw4990 qw4990 merged commit d8ad627 into pingcap:master Oct 14, 2019
XiaTianliang pushed a commit to XiaTianliang/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/expression contribution This PR is from a community contributor. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants