Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tag some ExternalAddress method as to ignore by testNoEquivalentSuperclassMethods #17416

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: Pharo13
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jecisc
Copy link
Member

@jecisc jecisc commented Nov 19, 2024

ExternalAddress reimplement multiple methods from it superclass to do the same and have some speed ups. Here I'm adding a pragma so that we declare them as false positive in testNoEquivalentSuperclassMethods with the goal of reducing little by little the number of violations of this test

…classMethods

ExternalAddress reimplement multiple methods from it superclass to do the same and have some speed ups. 
Here I'm adding a pragma so that we declare them as false positive in testNoEquivalentSuperclassMethods with the goal of reducing little by little the number of violations of this test
@jecisc jecisc added the Status: Need more work The issue is nearly ready. Waiting some last bits. label Nov 19, 2024
@Ducasse
Copy link
Member

Ducasse commented Nov 21, 2024

Good we should call that monomorphising the call sites :)

@Ducasse
Copy link
Member

Ducasse commented Nov 21, 2024

ReleaseTest.testNoEquivalentSuperclassMethods

@jecisc jecisc removed the Status: Need more work The issue is nearly ready. Waiting some last bits. label Nov 21, 2024
@jecisc jecisc closed this Nov 21, 2024
@jecisc jecisc reopened this Nov 21, 2024
@Ducasse
Copy link
Member

Ducasse commented Nov 21, 2024

Build did not pass and I wonder if this is not one of integration of hernan PR I did yesterday. This UI is super confusing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants