-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Strange behavior of looper check #459
Comments
2-6. Looper checks for each sample if Pipestat has been configured before proceeding with anything else. If pipestat can be successfully configured, it generates a configuration file to be used by pipestat
The message output to the terminal is a bit confusing; it should probably be For point 5 specifically, here is ~ the commit where we added that functionality in Sep: cd31351
|
I added a small commit to update the message output to be more accurate when initializing the pipestat configuration file. |
I believe this issue is going to require quite a bit of refactoring work and thinking about pipestat/looper integration. It should probably be pushed to 1.9.0 or even 2.0.0. This refactoring would also solve #425. For now, I could suppress the
vs
|
I made those minor changes to Looper and Pipestat, so that the terminal is less verbose when using Looper + Pipestat. |
With the work done in #496, this issue should be solved. I've cut down on pipestat's verbosity as well in the upcoming v0.9.2 release. |
I'm trying to configure a pipeline to use looper and pipestat. When I run
looper check
, it does very weird things:There are a several issues here:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: