Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(api)!: remove MutexNode reexports #12

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

pedromfedricci
Copy link
Owner

This PR removes all MutexNode reexports, since they do not particularly make import statements any shorter than using the canonical path, and because users may understand them as if they were different from each other, which is not the case.

Breaking changes:

  • Removed raw::spins::MutexNode.
  • Removed raw::yields::MutexNode.
  • Removed raw::loops::MutexNode.
  • Removed raw::spins::backoff::MutexNode.
  • Removed raw::yields::backoff::MutexNode.

Canonical path has not changed: raw::MutexNode.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.95%. Comparing base (563e5f9) to head (4f6b1c8).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #12   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.95%   97.95%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         196      196           
=======================================
  Hits          192      192           
  Misses          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pedromfedricci pedromfedricci merged commit c96347a into main Apr 9, 2024
9 checks passed
@pedromfedricci pedromfedricci deleted the remove-mutexnode-reexports branch April 9, 2024 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants