-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
multi-execution fails due to "remote contains work that you do not have locally" #104
Comments
Currently, this action does not support the multi-execution in one workflow. I can fix this. |
Done in dhimmel/rootstock-actions-deploy@2c8f625 and the actions both succeeded in https://github.com/dhimmel/rootstock-actions-deploy/runs/453415833. Thanks for adding multi-execution. Will let you close when this change is in master.
Yeah. I'm mostly interested in this point in figured out when github_token triggers Pages to see if we can guide Manubot users on how to use it successfully. Neither gh-pages commits at https://github.com/dhimmel/rootstock-actions-deploy/commits/gh-pages have triggered a Pages build... so let me know if you want me to try something to that repo in case it's valuable for testing. (the repo is just a testing prototype so can make any changes). |
I went to settings and under GitHub Pages > Source, I re-selected "gh-pages branch". This option was already selected but when I selected it again, the GItHub Pages section expanded to include additional options and info like:
So maybe this is sometimes required when using GITHUB_TOKEN. |
#109 has been merged, the We can close this issue.
Adding that notes to the README may be friendly for users. I opened #114 |
I am getting the following error when using the action (logs):
I can't think of any reasons why this would be the case. Nothing should have pushed to the
gh-pages
branch from the time the action / job began. I don't think this is a case where multiple jobs were running at once causing a race condition.Special considerations:
The workflow uses
peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v3
multiple times. It is the second step using this action that fails.In the previous commit, there was no
gh-pages
branch in the repository. The action seems to have created the newgh-pages
branch and then succeeded.I am attempting to use
secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN
on a public repository. The one commit that did get generated and pushed to gh-pages, does not seem to have triggered a GitHub Pages build, despite reports this is now working at About limitation of GITHUB_TOKEN #9 (comment).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: