We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We've got following warning from Fedora's linter: https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/104394/testReport/(root)/tests/_badfuncs/
The reason of such warning is well described here: https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora/blob/master/fedora.yaml#L719
I think we need to review our approach for these functions if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Examples:
fastnetmon/src/sflow_plugin/sflow_collector.cpp
Line 210 in bec1b5f
fastnetmon/src/fast_library.cpp
Line 57 in ce2eddc
Line 63 in ce2eddc
Sorry, something went wrong.
We get rid of one of them actually as part of project to port to Windows.
Migrated away from IPv4 only inet_addr in sFlow logic. Adds IPv6 supp…
d44385d
…ort for sFlow plugin. Related #936
One more fix in sFlow logic
No branches or pull requests
We've got following warning from Fedora's linter: https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/104394/testReport/(root)/tests/_badfuncs/
The reason of such warning is well described here: https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora/blob/master/fedora.yaml#L719
I think we need to review our approach for these functions if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: