Skip to content

refactor: Bump vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.8#3026

Merged
mtrezza merged 1 commit into
parse-community:alphafrom
mtrezza:refactor/vite-8.0.8
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

refactor: Bump vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.8#3026
mtrezza merged 1 commit into
parse-community:alphafrom
mtrezza:refactor/vite-8.0.8

Conversation

@mtrezza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mtrezza mtrezza commented Apr 16, 2026

Bump vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.8 (patch, devDependency).

Closes #3016

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated build tool and core dependencies to their latest versions for improved stability and performance.

@parse-github-assistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

  • Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
  • Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
  • Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
  • We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
  • Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
  • Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 66f7edc2-4d9f-4845-9770-3aa0eae3b39d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ebbf53 and a3a9fdf.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package-lock.json
  • package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Dependency version updates across package.json and package-lock.json. Primary changes include Vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.8, Rolldown from 1.0.0-rc.12 to 1.0.0-rc.15, and updates to @emnapi, @oxc-project/types, and @napi-rs/wasm-runtime packages.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Updates
package.json, package-lock.json
Bumped Vite from 8.0.5 → 8.0.8, Rolldown from 1.0.0-rc.12 → 1.0.0-rc.15 with all @rolldown/\* platform bindings, @emnapi packages (core/runtime 1.9.1 → 1.9.2, wasi-threads 1.2.0 → 1.2.1), @oxc-project/types 0.122.0 → 0.124.0, and @napi-rs/wasm-runtime 1.1.3 → 1.1.4. Updated integrity hashes and resolved URLs accordingly.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The PR description is minimal but includes the essential information: what was changed and which issue it closes. However, it does not follow the provided template structure with Issue/Approach/Tasks sections. Consider following the repository's PR template by adding Issue, Approach, and Tasks sections for consistency, even if some sections are brief or marked not applicable.
Engage In Review Feedback ❓ Inconclusive Cannot verify GitHub PR review feedback engagement as review comments are not accessible through git history alone. Access GitHub PR #3026 directly to verify if review feedback exists and whether the user engaged with it.
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title correctly uses the 'refactor:' prefix and accurately describes the main change: bumping vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.8.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully addresses the linked issue #3016 by updating vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.8 as a devDependency, including transitive dependency updates (rolldown, @emnapi packages, @oxc-project/types).
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are in-scope: only package.json and package-lock.json were modified to update vite and its transitive dependencies, directly aligning with the objective to bump vite from 8.0.5 to 8.0.8.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Security Check ✅ Passed Security analysis confirms only standard patch and minor version updates with routine bug fixes, no CVEs or vulnerabilities reported.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Checkov (3.2.519)
package.json

2026-04-16 23:34:59,368 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 23:34:59,370 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 23:34:59,371 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 23:34:59,407 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Failed to invoke function /usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner. with package.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 88, in func_wrapper
result = original_func(item)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner.py", line 74, in
results = parallel_runner.run_function(lambda f: (f, self._parse_file(f)), files_to_load)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/ope

... [truncated 2547 characters] ...

[MainThread ] [WARNI] Secret scanning: could not process file package.json
2026-04-16 23:34:59,444 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Exception traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/main.py", line 647, in run
self.scan_reports = runner_registry.run(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/runner_registry.py", line 177, in run
for result in parallel_runner_results:
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 118, in _run_function_multiprocess_fork
raise v.internal_exception.with_traceback(v.internal_exception.traceback)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'package.json'


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.98%. Comparing base (9ebbf53) to head (a3a9fdf).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on alpha.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            alpha    #3026   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.98%   99.98%           
=======================================
  Files          64       64           
  Lines        6333     6333           
  Branches     1523     1535   +12     
=======================================
  Hits         6332     6332           
  Misses          1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mtrezza mtrezza merged commit 845c69c into parse-community:alpha Apr 16, 2026
13 checks passed
@mtrezza mtrezza deleted the refactor/vite-8.0.8 branch April 16, 2026 23:48
@parseplatformorg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 This change has been released in version 8.6.0-alpha.1

@parseplatformorg parseplatformorg added the state:released-alpha Released as alpha version label Apr 17, 2026
@parseplatformorg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 This change has been released in version 8.6.0

@parseplatformorg parseplatformorg added the state:released Released as stable version label Apr 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state:released Released as stable version state:released-alpha Released as alpha version

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants