Skip to content

fix: publish-check-compile support no prdoc PRs#9532

Merged
iulianbarbu merged 1 commit intoparitytech:masterfrom
iulianbarbu:fix-parity-publish-when-no-prdoc
Aug 21, 2025
Merged

fix: publish-check-compile support no prdoc PRs#9532
iulianbarbu merged 1 commit intoparitytech:masterfrom
iulianbarbu:fix-parity-publish-when-no-prdoc

Conversation

@iulianbarbu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

publish-check-compile workflows fails if the PR has no prdoc. Add a few checks everytime we assume a prdoc exists.

Integration

N/A

Review Notes

N/A

Signed-off-by: Iulian Barbu <iulian.barbu@parity.io>
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu self-assigned this Aug 20, 2025
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu requested review from a team as code owners August 20, 2025 19:44
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu added the R0-no-crate-publish-required The change does not require any crates to be re-published. label Aug 20, 2025
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into paritytech:master with commit 42d3081 Aug 21, 2025
267 of 276 checks passed
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu deleted the fix-parity-publish-when-no-prdoc branch August 21, 2025 08:50
pepoviola pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2025
# Description

`publish-check-compile` workflows fails if the PR has no prdoc. Add a
few checks everytime we assume a prdoc exists.

## Integration

N/A

## Review Notes

N/A

Signed-off-by: Iulian Barbu <iulian.barbu@parity.io>
alvicsam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
# Description

`publish-check-compile` workflows fails if the PR has no prdoc. Add a
few checks everytime we assume a prdoc exists.

## Integration

N/A

## Review Notes

N/A

Signed-off-by: Iulian Barbu <iulian.barbu@parity.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

R0-no-crate-publish-required The change does not require any crates to be re-published.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants