add fresh weights for westend asset hub#10284
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
/cmd bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend |
Contributor
|
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend" has started 🚀 See logs here |
…t_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend'
Contributor
|
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend" has finished ✅ See logs here DetailsSubweight results:
Command output:✅ Successful benchmarks of runtimes/pallets: |
Contributor
Author
|
/cmd prdoc --bump patch |
…adot-sdk into kiz-epmb-westend-weights
…adot-sdk into kiz-epmb-westend-weights
…adot-sdk into kiz-epmb-westend-weights
ggwpez
reviewed
Nov 11, 2025
ggwpez
reviewed
Nov 11, 2025
ggwpez
reviewed
Nov 11, 2025
ggwpez
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2025
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
bkchr
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
/cmd bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block::signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block::verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block::unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend |
Contributor
|
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block::signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block::verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block::unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend" has started 🚀 See logs here |
seadanda
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2025
…t_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block::signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block::verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block::unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend'
Contributor
|
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block::signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block::verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block::unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend" has finished ✅ See logs here DetailsSubweight results:
Command output:✅ Successful benchmarks of runtimes/pallets: |
sigurpol
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2025
…adot-sdk into kiz-epmb-westend-weights
sigurpol
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2025
|
All GitHub workflows were cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs. |
Contributor
Author
|
/cmd bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block --runtime asset-hub-westend |
Contributor
|
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block --runtime asset-hub-westend" has started 🚀 See logs here |
…t_election_provider_multi_block --runtime asset-hub-westend'
Contributor
|
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block --runtime asset-hub-westend" has finished ✅ See logs here DetailsSubweight results:
Command output:✅ Successful benchmarks of runtimes/pallets: |
bkontur
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled
November 12, 2025 14:25
Pull Request is not mergeable
0xRVE
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2025
- And deprecate `FastUnstake` as it is unsafe - And use the faster solver for benchmarks to speed things up - Remove hardcoded weights of westend. A step to reduce the diff size in #9925 --------- Co-authored-by: cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
fellowship-merge-bot Bot
added a commit
to polkadot-fellows/runtimes
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
Closes: #894 - [x] Does not require a CHANGELOG entry Same trick as in paritytech/polkadot-sdk#10284, if it works. should close #894 --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: fellowship-merge-bot[bot] <151052383+fellowship-merge-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-project-automation
Bot
moved this from Todo
to Done
in [preview] release tracker
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FastUnstakeas it is unsafeA step to reduce the diff size in #9925