voter: only primary voter proposes and only once#57
Conversation
1582270 to
2a22404
Compare
|
We discussed this in the original PR and I was against including the |
|
Sorry I missed that discussion. What if the local id is exposed from the |
marcio-diaz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think @rphmeier wanted to filter them at Substrate level. Except for that lgtm.
|
Yeah, although it does seem like a somewhat debatable point. I think we either go all-the-way with |
The idea is that with #55 we will just call |
|
I agree that doing the filtering on substrate is more inline with what we have now, especially with #55. I'll update this PR shortly to remove this. |
|
After discussing this with @rphmeier we've decided to go "all-in" on using the |
No description provided.