-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Update Type Definitions to latest PolkadotJS #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d3f2fc6
update definitions to latest polkadot.js
26fb7c6
handle custom bit-size declarations for polkadotjs
6cbc5af
update type definitions
02f19e1
update substrate
7e6e3f1
fix type in warning
841a8a3
include older address decoding from https://github.com/paritytech/sub…
1f5d5b6
remove duplicate match in enum on MultiAddress
5d58622
merge with master
c3cc791
rustfmt
022a859
remove comment with old implementation
ae81fb7
typo
d4d67c9
remove backtrace
6d45bf1
fix clippy lints
ff867b1
Update core/src/decoder.rs
insipx 9441229
move need_more_than into decode_old_address
3de3101
Merge branch 'insipx/update-type-definitions' of github.com:paritytec…
c6bdd11
Update core/src/decoder.rs
insipx 6dc9052
Update core/src/lib.rs
insipx c288fd0
Update core/src/decoder.rs
insipx 0b42103
fix whitespace & capture groups
d67d602
Merge branch 'insipx/update-type-definitions' of github.com:paritytec…
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIU there's nothing checks that
cursorandcursor + 1are valid indexes intodata slicebut maybe checked somewhere else?It may panic then.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah,
This is part of the larger issue that the function
decode_singledoesn't do any bounds checking on the cursor at all, and panics if anything goes wrong. I'd rather address that in it's own PR though, since it might be a bit of a larger/medium sized refactor so I opened #35 to track thatThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, cool