chore: fix all the obvious clippy warnings

[tomarST]

Partial fix for #1462

[rakita]

ty for contributing! cargo +nightly fmt is needed

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1520 (6612fa2) into main (0fc9f67) will decrease coverage by 0.45%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1520      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.00%   75.56%   -0.45%     
==========================================
  Files         358      368      +10     
  Lines       42660    43025     +365     
==========================================
+ Hits        32423    32510      +87     
- Misses      10237    10515     +278     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-tests	21.70% <0.00%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
unit-tests	70.04% <100.00%> (-0.41%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
crates/stages/src/stages/index_account_history.rs	98.18% <100.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
crates/stages/src/stages/index_storage_history.rs	98.30% <100.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
crates/rpc/rpc/src/eth/error.rs	13.88% <0.00%> (-12.43%)	⬇️
bin/reth/src/args/rpc_server_args.rs	63.46% <0.00%> (-8.19%)	⬇️
crates/rpc/rpc/src/eth/api/mod.rs	69.13% <0.00%> (-5.54%)	⬇️
crates/storage/provider/src/test_utils/mock.rs	44.84% <0.00%> (-4.49%)	⬇️
crates/net/discv4/src/proto.rs	89.66% <0.00%> (-3.13%)	⬇️
crates/net/eth-wire/src/ethstream.rs	83.97% <0.00%> (-3.07%)	⬇️
crates/rpc/rpc-engine-api/src/engine_api.rs	92.37% <0.00%> (-1.44%)	⬇️
crates/net/network/src/session/mod.rs	76.59% <0.00%> (-1.36%)	⬇️
... and 45 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[rkrasiuk]

@tomarST thanks! i've changed the PR description in order to unlink the PR from the issue since this doesn't fix all the warnings. moving forward, could you pls also avoid making PRs from the fork main branch? this makes it cumbersome to check out the PRs locally

[rkrasiuk]

@tomarST are you planning to add smth here or can we move it from the draft status?