Skip to content

Conversation

@ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Contributor

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • passes black pandas
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
  • whatsnew entry

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh changed the title STY: absolute imports STY: absolute imports in __init__ files Jan 8, 2020
Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm ping on green

@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
from .base import ( # noqa: F401
from pandas.core.arrays.base import ( # noqa: F401
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you wanted to clean up more I think preferable to specify all instead of noqa: F401 for these

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you give me an example?
I don't understand what do you mean by all or you meant __all__?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea the latter

@WillAyd WillAyd added the Code Style Code style, linting, code_checks label Jan 8, 2020
@WillAyd WillAyd added this to the 1.0 milestone Jan 9, 2020
@WillAyd WillAyd merged commit ba58ead into pandas-dev:master Jan 9, 2020
@ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was just about to ping :)

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented Jan 9, 2020

Thanks @MomIsBestFriend

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh deleted the STY-abs-import-__init__ branch January 9, 2020 00:15
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

jorisvandenbossche commented Jan 9, 2020

Personally, I am -1 on those changes (or #30827).
@MomIsBestFriend before you do any more of such PRs on absolute imports (although I don't know if there are cases left?), can we first have a discussion about this?

@ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jorisvandenbossche I actually did want to discuss this, so I opened this PR which as you can see has only two changes. And when it got merged I saw it as an approval to go and change even more files.

Anyway, I don't mind reverting #30822, #30827, #30828.
Until this topic is fully discussed.

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Code Style Code style, linting, code_checks

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants