-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 19.2k
ENH: Sorting of ExtensionArrays #19957
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
0ec3600
4707273
b61fb8d
44b6d72
5be3917
e474c20
c2578c3
b73e303
0db9e97
baf624c
ce92f7b
8cbfc36
425fb2a
7bbe796
35a8977
7efece2
5c758aa
d5e8198
c776133
4885245
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1378,17 +1378,24 @@ def check_for_ordered(self, op): | |
| "you can use .as_ordered() to change the " | ||
| "Categorical to an ordered one\n".format(op=op)) | ||
|
|
||
| def argsort(self, ascending=True, kind='quicksort', *args, **kwargs): | ||
| """ | ||
| Returns the indices that would sort the Categorical instance if | ||
| 'sort_values' was called. This function is implemented to provide | ||
| compatibility with numpy ndarray objects. | ||
| def _values_for_argsort(self): | ||
| return self._codes.copy() | ||
|
|
||
| While an ordering is applied to the category values, arg-sorting | ||
| in this context refers more to organizing and grouping together | ||
| based on matching category values. Thus, this function can be | ||
| called on an unordered Categorical instance unlike the functions | ||
| 'Categorical.min' and 'Categorical.max'. | ||
| def argsort(self, *args, **kwargs): | ||
| # TODO(PY2): use correct signature | ||
| # We have to do *args, **kwargs to avoid a a py2-only signature | ||
| # issue since np.argsort differs from argsort. | ||
| """Return the indicies that would sort the Categorical. | ||
|
|
||
| Parameters | ||
| ---------- | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. do these doc-strings meet the new standards? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 7bbe796 does, aside from examples which isn't really possible. |
||
| ascending : bool, default True | ||
| Whether the indices should result in an ascending | ||
| or descending sort. | ||
| kind : {'quicksort', 'mergesort', 'heapsort'}, optional | ||
| Sorting algorithm. | ||
| *args, **kwargs: | ||
| passed through to :func:`numpy.argsort`. | ||
|
|
||
| Returns | ||
| ------- | ||
|
|
@@ -1397,12 +1404,28 @@ def argsort(self, ascending=True, kind='quicksort', *args, **kwargs): | |
| See also | ||
| -------- | ||
| numpy.ndarray.argsort | ||
|
|
||
| Notes | ||
| ----- | ||
| While an ordering is applied to the category values, arg-sorting | ||
| in this context refers more to organizing and grouping together | ||
| based on matching category values. Thus, this function can be | ||
| called on an unordered Categorical instance unlike the functions | ||
| 'Categorical.min' and 'Categorical.max'. | ||
|
|
||
| Examples | ||
| -------- | ||
| >>> pd.Categorical(['b', 'b', 'a', 'c']).argsort() | ||
| array([2, 0, 1, 3]) | ||
|
|
||
| >>> cat = pd.Categorical(['b', 'b', 'a', 'c'], | ||
| ... categories=['c', 'b', 'a'], | ||
| ... ordered=True) | ||
| >>> cat.argsort() | ||
| array([3, 0, 1, 2]) | ||
| """ | ||
| ascending = nv.validate_argsort_with_ascending(ascending, args, kwargs) | ||
| result = np.argsort(self._codes.copy(), kind=kind, **kwargs) | ||
| if not ascending: | ||
| result = result[::-1] | ||
| return result | ||
| # Keep the implementation here just for the docstring. | ||
| return super(Categorical, self).argsort(*args, **kwargs) | ||
|
|
||
| def sort_values(self, inplace=False, ascending=True, na_position='last'): | ||
| """ Sorts the Categorical by category value returning a new | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if this changes our opinion on
_values_for_argsort, but the apparently Python2 has issues with passing through the arguments correctly to thesuper()call.Changing the Categorical.argsort to accept just
*args, **kwargsfixes things, sinceExtensionArraydoes the argument validation, but it's a bit unfortunate.