Skip to content

Conversation

@LaurentGoderre
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@LaurentGoderre
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @kit-ty-kate

@jkowalleck jkowalleck added the PURL type definition Non-core definitions that describe and standardize PURL types label Oct 17, 2024
@johnmhoran johnmhoran added this to the 1.1 milestone Apr 4, 2025
@pombredanne
Copy link
Member

@LaurentGoderre here too.... after the merge of PR #514, PURL tests and defs are now defined in new JSON schemas 👼 😇 😁 :

... therefore with the new approach... this PR would need to be updated.

Do you think you can update this PR to the new format?

Sorry for the churn. ❤️

@mjherzog mjherzog removed this from the PURL-TBD milestone Sep 18, 2025
@pombredanne
Copy link
Member

@LaurentGoderre or @kit-ty-kate do you mind to update the PR using the new JSON-based approach? That would be awesome! and quite timely with:

Pinging the Ocaml security team lead too: @hannesm

@hannesm
Copy link
Contributor

hannesm commented Dec 4, 2025

Thanks for the ping. Give me until the end of the week / next Monday to go over it. I also have a package-url implementtion in OCaml that I'm happy to share soon...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Proposed new type PURL type definition Non-core definitions that describe and standardize PURL types type: opam Proposed new type

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants