Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do not swallow the output when checking for existence of the static binary in the PTF eBPF test. #4601

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Do not swallow the output when checking for existence of the static binary in the PTF eBPF test. #4601

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

fruffy
Copy link
Collaborator

@fruffy fruffy commented Apr 5, 2024

No description provided.

@fruffy fruffy added ebpf-psa Topics related to the eBPF PSA back end infrastructure Topics related to code style and build and test infrastructure. labels Apr 5, 2024
jafingerhut
jafingerhut approved these changes Apr 5, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jafingerhut jafingerhut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@fruffy fruffy added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit bd7bcd9 Apr 5, 2024
17 checks passed
@fruffy fruffy deleted the fruffy/ptf_test_fix branch April 5, 2024 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jafingerhut jafingerhut jafingerhut approved these changes

@vlstill vlstill Awaiting requested review from vlstill

@osinstom osinstom Awaiting requested review from osinstom

@tatry tatry Awaiting requested review from tatry

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ebpf-psa Topics related to the eBPF PSA back end infrastructure Topics related to code style and build and test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@fruffy @jafingerhut