Closed
Conversation
1. First of all, this doesn't work in nixpkgs. Per [1], gcc ignores `-L` for purposes of `--print-file-dirs`, which breaks horribly on linux. But if we don't pass extra dirs, meosn first just tries `-l...`, which does work. 2. Even if it did work, `libdir` means where we are installing libs, not where libs are expected to be found. Those are not necessarily the same (again, nixpkgs), and even when they are and non-standard, it is better to use DESTDIR or have a modified toolchain. [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87758
This means do autodetection if the user doesn't specify.
1. Fix that for libsodium 2. Consistently capitalize
- `crossSystem` in `shell.nix` - `buildInputs` vs `nativeBuildInputs`
Fix build in nix shell
This commit just moves the code, nothing leverages this yet.
Also heh, from editline to libeditline again, after a142164.
- editline_dep for editline.h - libbz2_dep for bzlib.h, except we cannot because no pkg-config file so document that.
p01arst0rm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2021
This deadlocks ProgressBar, e.g.
# nix run --impure --no-substitute --store '/tmp/nix2?store=/foo' --expr 'derivation { builder = /nix/store/zi90rxslsm4mlr46l2xws1rm94g7pk8p-busybox-1.31.1-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/bin/busybox; }'
leads to
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff6126e80 (LWP 12250)):
#0 0x00007ffff7215d62 in __lll_lock_wait () from /nix/store/9df65igwjmf2wbw0gbrrgair6piqjgmi-glibc-2.31/lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x00007ffff720e721 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /nix/store/9df65igwjmf2wbw0gbrrgair6piqjgmi-glibc-2.31/lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 0x00007ffff7ad17fa in __gthread_mutex_lock (__mutex=0x6c5448) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/gthr-default.h:749
#3 std::mutex::lock (this=0x6c5448) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/std_mutex.h:100
#4 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::lock (this=0x7fffffff09a8, this=0x7fffffff09a8) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/unique_lock.h:141
#5 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::unique_lock (__m=..., this=0x7fffffff09a8) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/unique_lock.h:71
#6 nix::Sync<nix::ProgressBar::State, std::mutex>::Lock::Lock (s=0x6c5448, this=0x7fffffff09a0) at src/libutil/sync.hh:45
#7 nix::Sync<nix::ProgressBar::State, std::mutex>::lock (this=0x6c5448) at src/libutil/sync.hh:85
#8 nix::ProgressBar::logEI (this=0x6c5440, ei=...) at src/libmain/progress-bar.cc:131
#9 0x00007ffff7608cfd in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x6c5440) at src/libutil/logging.hh:88
#10 nix::getCodeLines (errPos=...) at src/libutil/error.cc:66
#11 0x00007ffff76073f2 in nix::showErrorInfo (out=..., einfo=..., showTrace=<optimized out>) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/optional:897
#12 0x00007ffff7ad19e7 in nix::ProgressBar::logEI (this=0x6c5440, ei=...) at src/libmain/progress-bar.cc:134
#13 0x00007ffff7ab9d10 in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x6c5440) at src/libutil/logging.hh:88
#14 nix::handleExceptions(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::function<void ()>) (programName="/home/eelco/Dev/nix/outputs/out/bin/nix", fun=...) at src/libmain/shared.cc:328
#15 0x000000000046226b in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/ext/new_allocator.h:80
Owner
Hey!! sorry i took so long to look at this, life got in the way i've actually just updated the buildsystem to the latest version of nix, could you take a look and update your changes for that? |
40581e7 to
0c6bcc3
Compare
43ebd67 to
1616cea
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the change we talked about of putting the checks after the dependencies, so the dependencies can be used in the checks. This will ensure if a dependency needs specials flags, the check will still work.
You probably want to review commit by commit :)