fix(semantic): report error on await inside block inside static block

[camc314]

No description provided.

[camc314]

• fix(semantic): report error on await inside block inside static block #20750 👈 (View in Graphite)
• fix(semantic): report error on for-await inside block inside static block #20749
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent changes, fast-track this PR to the front of the merge queue

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR ensures await inside a nested {} block within a class static { ... } initialization block is correctly reported as an error during semantic checking, and updates coverage artifacts accordingly.

Changes:

• Update check_await_expression to detect being inside a class static block via ancestor scope traversal (not just the current scope).
• Add a new negative coverage fixture for await inside a nested block within a class static block.
• Update the parser_misc snapshot to include the new expected diagnostic and increment negative test counts.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
tasks/coverage/snapshots/parser_misc.snap	Adds expected diagnostic output for the new negative case and updates summary counts.
tasks/coverage/misc/fail/await-expr-in-block-in-class-static-block.mjs	New negative fixture exercising await in a nested block inside static {}.
crates/oxc_semantic/src/checker/javascript.rs	Makes class-static-block detection robust for await by walking scope ancestors.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 48 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 8 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing c/03-25-fix_parser_report_error_on_await_inside_block_inside_static_block (aa0f825) with main (ccf9301)}

Footnotes

1. 8 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[camc314]

Merge activity

• Mar 26, 1:58 PM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Mar 26, 2:00 PM UTC: camc314 added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Mar 26, 2:07 PM UTC: The Graphite merge queue couldn't merge this PR because it had merge conflicts.
• Mar 26, 2:09 PM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Mar 26, 2:16 PM UTC: camc314 added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Mar 26, 2:21 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.