docs(linter): Improve prefer-spread docs.

[connorshea]

And diagnostic.

The rule previously said it was a merging of two rules, but we support the other rule as well, so that doens't really make sense.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR improves the documentation and diagnostic messages for the prefer-spread linter rule. The changes remove the outdated claim that this rule is a combination of two separate rules and update the messaging to be more concise and consistent.

Changes:

• Updated diagnostic message from "Require spread operators instead of .apply()" to "Use spread operators instead of .apply()."
• Removed the documentation statement claiming the rule combines two ESLint rules
• Improved code formatting in documentation by adding backticks around .apply()

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
crates/oxc_linter/src/snapshots/eslint_prefer_spread.snap	Updated all diagnostic messages in test snapshots to reflect the new wording
crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/prefer_spread.rs	Updated the diagnostic function and documentation comments to improve clarity and accuracy

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing spread-docs (78edab4) with main (bbadb8e)}

Summary

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 41 skipped benchmarks¹

Footnotes

1. 41 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[camc314]

Merge activity

• Jan 14, 11:44 AM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Jan 14, 11:44 AM UTC: camc314 added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Jan 14, 11:59 AM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.