fix(formatter/sort-imports): hard line inside multiline import leads to incorrect results

[nilptr]

This PR fixes a minor issue mentioned in #17576.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing nilptr:nilptr/oxfmt/fix/hard-line-in-multiline-import (a763a80) with main (06288ef)¹}

Summary

✅ 38 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 7 skipped benchmarks²

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (e384c49) during the generation of this report, so 06288ef was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 7 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[leaysgur]

Would you please:

• double check this fix is really needed?
  • I recall having made a similar fixes recently
• add test cases for this?
  • All tests are in crates/oxc_formatter/tests/ir_transform/sort_imports.rs.

[nilptr]

sorry, I copied the markdown from the description, didn't notice the image is broken.

1. Yes, it's needed. Your fixes handle the multiline comment, while this fix focus on the comment inside a multiline import.
2. added a test case

[leaysgur]

Thank you!