chore(linter): Add some unused fix tests for unicorn rules

[connorshea]

Basically just adding some minor changes from the upstream rules (found by deleting the rules and then re-generating them and looking through the diff in the tests). I had hoped to find more tests for pending fixes, but didn't really find many.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds minor test improvements for unicorn linter rules, aligned with upstream changes. The changes primarily consist of adding TODO comments for future autofix implementations and including additional test cases that were found in the upstream repository.

Key changes:

• Added new test cases for prefer_logical_operator_over_ternary rule with multi-line test inputs
• Added TODO comments indicating pending autofix implementations for three rules
• Included a commented-out test case for prefer_modern_math_apis that needs fixing

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
unicorn_prefer_logical_operator_over_ternary.snap	Updated snapshot with two new test case outputs for the logical operator preference rule
prefer_logical_operator_over_ternary.rs	Added two new failing test cases with multi-line input to ensure proper handling
prefer_modern_math_apis.rs	Added a commented-out test case with TODO for complex parentheses handling
prefer_default_parameters.rs	Added TODO comment clarifying that autofix is not yet implemented
prefer_array_find.rs	Added TODO comment for pending autofix implementation
prefer_add_event_listener.rs	Added _fix variable with a test case for future autofix implementation

The changes are well-structured and appropriately document areas that need future work. No issues were identified during the review.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #17475 will not alter performance

_{Comparing add-fix-tests-for-unicorn-rules (f8cabd7) with main (435e955)¹}

Summary

✅ 4 untouched
⏩ 41 skipped²

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (174375d) during the generation of this report, so 435e955 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 41 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[camc314]

Merge activity

• Dec 30, 11:00 AM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Dec 30, 11:00 AM UTC: camc314 added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Dec 30, 11:06 AM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.