feat(linter): add n/global-require rule

[baevm]

this PR adds n/global-require rule, issue #493

source doc
source code

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds the n/global-require linter rule from eslint-plugin-n, which enforces that require() calls are placed at top-level module scope. This helps improve code clarity by making dependencies easier to identify and prevents potential performance issues from synchronous loading within functions or conditional statements.

Key Changes:

• Implements the GlobalRequire rule that detects require() calls not at module scope
• Adds comprehensive test cases covering various invalid patterns (functions, conditionals, try-catch, arrow functions)
• Properly handles shadowed require identifiers to avoid false positives

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/node/global_require.rs	Core implementation of the global-require rule with logic to detect non-top-level require() calls
crates/oxc_linter/src/snapshots/node_global_require.snap	Snapshot test output showing expected diagnostic messages for various violation patterns
crates/oxc_linter/src/rules.rs	Registers the new global_require module in the node plugin section
crates/oxc_linter/src/generated/rule_runner_impls.rs	Generated implementation registering the rule to run on CallExpression AST nodes

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[camc314]

Thank you!

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #17283 will not alter performance

_{Comparing baevm:n/global-require (2cb025a) with main (5cc7c90)¹}

Summary

✅ 4 untouched
⏩ 41 skipped²

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (1dc371e) during the generation of this report, so 5cc7c90 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 41 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩