feat(parser): produce syntax error for ({ foo(bar) })

[Boshen]

closes #17265

[Boshen]

• feat(parser): produce syntax error for ({ foo(bar) }) #17267 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds proper syntax error detection for object methods without function bodies in the pattern ({ foo(bar) }), addressing issue #17265.

• Updated parser logic to require function bodies for object methods even in TypeScript mode
• Improved error reporting for missing function bodies in object literal methods and accessors

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
crates/oxc_parser/src/js/function.rs	Modified condition to enforce function body requirement for object methods regardless of TypeScript mode
tasks/coverage/snapshots/parser_typescript.snap	Updated test snapshots to reflect new error messages and passing test for objectLiteralMemberWithoutBlock1.ts

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #17267 will not alter performance

_{Comparing 12-22-feat_parser_produce_syntax_error_for_foo_bar_ (4ac23e1) with main (a5ef127)}

Summary

✅ 42 untouched
⏩ 3 skipped¹

Footnotes

1. 3 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[graphite-app]

Merge activity

• Dec 22, 12:11 PM UTC: Boshen added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Dec 22, 12:18 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.