docs(linter): always refer as "ES2015" instead of "ES6"

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/no_var.rs

@@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ pub struct NoVar;
 declare_oxc_lint!(
     /// ### What it does
     ///
-    /// ECMAScript 6 allows programmers to create variables with block scope
+    /// ECMAScript 2015 allows programmers to create variables with block scope
     /// instead of function scope using the `let` and `const` keywords.  Block
     /// scope is common in many other programming languages and helps
     /// programmers avoid mistakes.
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///
-    /// Using `var` in an es6 environment triggers this error
+    /// Using `var` in an ES2015 environment triggers this error
     ///
     /// ### Examples
     ///

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/prefer_destructuring.rs

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ declare_oxc_lint!(
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///
-    /// With JavaScript ES6, a new syntax was added for creating variables from an array index or object property,
+    /// With JavaScript ES2015, a new syntax was added for creating variables from an array index or object property,
     /// called destructuring. This rule enforces usage of destructuring
     /// instead of accessing a property through a member expression.
     ///

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/prefer_numeric_literals.rs

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ declare_oxc_lint!(
     ///
     /// The parseInt() and Number.parseInt() functions can be used to turn binary, octal, and
     /// hexadecimal strings into integers. As binary, octal, and hexadecimal literals are supported
-    /// in ES6, this rule encourages use of those numeric literals instead of parseInt() or
+    /// in ES2015, this rule encourages use of those numeric literals instead of parseInt() or
     /// Number.parseInt().
     ///
     /// ### Examples

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/jsdoc/implements_on_classes.rs

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ use crate::{
 
 fn implements_on_classes_diagnostic(span: Span) -> OxcDiagnostic {
     OxcDiagnostic::warn("`@implements` used on a non-constructor function")
-        .with_help("Add `@class` tag or use ES6 class syntax.")
+        .with_help("Add `@class` tag or use class syntax.")
         .with_label(span)
 }
 
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ declare_oxc_lint!(
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///
     /// Constructor functions should be
-    /// whether marked with `@class`, `@constructs`, or being an ES6 class constructor.
+    /// whether marked with `@class`, `@constructs`, or being a class constructor.
     ///
     /// ### Examples
     ///

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/jsdoc/no_defaults.rs

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ declare_oxc_lint!(
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///
     /// The rule is intended to prevent the indication of defaults on tags
-    /// where this would be redundant with ES6 default parameters.
+    /// where this would be redundant with ES2015 default parameters.
     ///
     /// ### Examples
     ///

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/oxc/bad_array_method_on_arguments.rs

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ use crate::{AstNode, context::LintContext, rule::Rule};
 fn bad_array_method_on_arguments_diagnostic(method_name: &str, span: Span) -> OxcDiagnostic {
     OxcDiagnostic::warn("Bad array method on arguments")
         .with_help(format!(
-            "The 'arguments' object does not have a '{method_name}()' method. If you intended to use an array method, consider converting the 'arguments' object to an array or using an ES6 rest parameter instead."
+            "The 'arguments' object does not have a '{method_name}()' method. If you intended to use an array method, consider converting the 'arguments' object to an array or using an ES2015 rest parameter instead."
         ))
         .with_label(span)
 }

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/react/no_is_mounted.rs

@@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ pub struct NoIsMounted;
 declare_oxc_lint!(
     /// ### What it does
     ///
-    /// This rule prevents using isMounted in ES6 classes
+    /// This rule prevents using isMounted in classes
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///
-    /// isMounted is an anti-pattern, is not available when using ES6 classes,
+    /// isMounted is an anti-pattern, is not available when using classes,
     /// and it is on its way to being officially deprecated.///
     ///
     /// ### Examples

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/react/prefer_es6_class.rs

@@ -11,11 +11,13 @@ use crate::{
 };
 
 fn unexpected_es6_class_diagnostic(span: Span) -> OxcDiagnostic {
-    OxcDiagnostic::warn("Components should use createClass instead of ES6 class.").with_label(span)
+    OxcDiagnostic::warn("Components should use createClass instead of an ES2015 class.")
+        .with_label(span)
 }
 
 fn expected_es6_class_diagnostic(span: Span) -> OxcDiagnostic {
-    OxcDiagnostic::warn("Components should use ES6 class instead of createClass.").with_label(span)
+    OxcDiagnostic::warn("Components should use an ES2015 class instead of createClass.")
+        .with_label(span)
 }
 
 #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone)]
@@ -27,7 +29,7 @@ declare_oxc_lint!(
     /// ### What it does
     ///
     /// React offers you two ways to create traditional components: using the ES5
-    /// create-react-class module or the new ES6 class system.
+    /// create-react-class module or the new ES2015 class system.
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/react/require_render_return.rs

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ pub struct RequireRenderReturn;
 declare_oxc_lint!(
     /// ### What it does
     ///
-    /// Enforce ES5 or ES6 class for returning value in render function
+    /// Enforce ES5 or ES2015 class for returning value in render function
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///

crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/typescript/no_this_alias.rs

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ use crate::{
 
 fn no_this_alias_diagnostic(span: Span) -> OxcDiagnostic {
     OxcDiagnostic::warn("Unexpected aliasing of 'this' to local variable.")
-        .with_help("Assigning a variable to this instead of properly using arrow lambdas may be a symptom of pre-ES6 practices or not managing scope well.")
+        .with_help("Assigning a variable to this instead of properly using arrow lambdas may be a symptom of pre-ES2015 practices or not managing scope well.")
         .with_label(span)
 }
 
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ declare_oxc_lint!(
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///
-    /// Assigning a variable to `this` instead of properly using arrow lambdas may be a symptom of pre-ES6 practices or not managing scope well.
+    /// Assigning a variable to `this` instead of properly using arrow lambdas may be a symptom of pre-ES2015 practices or not managing scope well.
     NoThisAlias,
     typescript,
     correctness,

crates/oxc_linter/src/snapshots/jsdoc_implements_on_classes.snap

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ source: crates/oxc_linter/src/tester.rs
    ·                      ───────────
  4 │                    */
    ╰────
-  help: Add `@class` tag or use ES6 class syntax.
+  help: Add `@class` tag or use class syntax.
 
   ⚠ eslint-plugin-jsdoc(implements-on-classes): `@implements` used on a non-constructor function
    ╭─[implements_on_classes.tsx:3:13]
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ source: crates/oxc_linter/src/tester.rs
    ·                      ───────────
  4 │                    */
    ╰────
-  help: Add `@class` tag or use ES6 class syntax.
+  help: Add `@class` tag or use class syntax.
 
   ⚠ eslint-plugin-jsdoc(implements-on-classes): `@implements` used on a non-constructor function
    ╭─[implements_on_classes.tsx:4:13]
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ source: crates/oxc_linter/src/tester.rs
    ·                      ───────────
  5 │                    */
    ╰────
-  help: Add `@class` tag or use ES6 class syntax.
+  help: Add `@class` tag or use class syntax.