docs(linter): Add doc comments for func_style options.#14847
docs(linter): Add doc comments for func_style options.#14847camc314 merged 1 commit intooxc-project:mainfrom
Conversation
This one is a bit weird in that there's an overrides > namedExports option that's nested? But the struct doesn't appear to quite match that expectation. Also, the struct doesn't quite match the fact that there's no key for `style`, it's just a string value at the top level.
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds documentation comments to the FuncStyle configuration struct fields, improving code documentation for the func_style linter rule. The comments describe each configuration option's purpose and allowed values.
- Added doc comments for all four fields in the
FuncStylestruct - Documentation aligns with ESLint's
func-stylerule configuration options
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #14847 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
Footnotes
|
This one is a bit weird in that there's an overrides > namedExports option that's nested? But the struct doesn't appear to quite match that expectation. Also, the struct doesn't quite match the fact that there's no key for
style, it's just a string value at the top level.Part of #14743.
Generated docs: