Skip to content

test(linter/expect-expect): add test case for expect call in for loop#12907

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
c/08-08-test_linter_expect-expect_add_test_case_for_expect_call_in_for_loop
Aug 8, 2025
Merged

test(linter/expect-expect): add test case for expect call in for loop#12907
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
c/08-08-test_linter_expect-expect_add_test_case_for_expect_call_in_for_loop

Conversation

@camc314
Copy link
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 commented Aug 8, 2025

fixes #12905

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter C-test Category - Testing. Code is missing test cases, or a PR is adding them labels Aug 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor Author

camc314 commented Aug 8, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Merge activity

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Aug 8, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #12907 will not alter performance

Comparing c/08-08-test_linter_expect-expect_add_test_case_for_expect_call_in_for_loop (281f939) with main (84794eb)1

Summary

✅ 34 untouched benchmarks

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (281f939) during the generation of this report, so 84794eb was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the c/08-08-refactor_linter_expect-expect_use_visitor_pattern_to_detect_expect_calls branch from 9cc3ac3 to 106e7a7 Compare August 8, 2025 11:33
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the c/08-08-test_linter_expect-expect_add_test_case_for_expect_call_in_for_loop branch from 20bca4b to 281f939 Compare August 8, 2025 11:34
Base automatically changed from c/08-08-refactor_linter_expect-expect_use_visitor_pattern_to_detect_expect_calls to main August 8, 2025 11:37
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 281f939 into main Aug 8, 2025
26 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the c/08-08-test_linter_expect-expect_add_test_case_for_expect_call_in_for_loop branch August 8, 2025 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-test Category - Testing. Code is missing test cases, or a PR is adding them

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

linter: false positve in jest/expect-expect

1 participant