fix(transformer/legacy-decorator): decorates insertion order is incorrect#11144
Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom May 20, 2025
Conversation
Member
Author
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance ReportMerging #11144 will degrade performances by 12.4%Comparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
6c3ec82 to
13d2b27
Compare
404cdd4 to
38387b7
Compare
13d2b27 to
18d6d4e
Compare
Member
Merge activity
|
18d6d4e to
7b8f4b9
Compare
38387b7 to
468ddf4
Compare
7b8f4b9 to
f8de471
Compare
f8de471 to
b07a2eb
Compare
…rect (#11144) Insert the decorations early rather than waiting for the `class` assignment to insert them together. This is to avoid the decorators being inserted before the `defineProperty(xxx)` which could cause accessing an field still doesn't decorated yet. Input: ```ts function Bar(): ClassDecorator { return (_target) => { console.log(Bar.name) } } @bar() class Foo { static foo = `${Foo.name}`; } ``` Before output: ```js var _Foo; function Bar() { return (_target) => { console.log(Bar.name); }; } let Foo = _Foo = class Foo {}; babelHelpers.defineProperty(Foo, "foo", `${_Foo.name}`); Foo = _Foo = babelHelpers.decorate([Bar()], Foo); ``` After output: ```js var _Foo; function Bar() { return (_target) => { console.log(Bar.name); }; } let Foo = _Foo = class Foo {}; Foo = _Foo = babelHelpers.decorate([Bar()], Foo); babelHelpers.defineProperty(Foo, "foo", `${_Foo.name}`); ```
b07a2eb to
fcd5ba9
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Insert the decorations early rather than waiting for the
classassignment to insert them together. This is to avoid the decorators being inserted before thedefineProperty(xxx)which could cause accessing an field still doesn't decorated yet.Input:
Before output:
After output: