fix(transformer/jsx): fix parsing JSX pragma comments

[overlookmotel]

Fixes #10955.

Allow multiple JSX pragmas in a single comment, or even in the same line. e.g.

/* @jsx h @jsxRuntime classic */

// @jsx h @jsxRuntime classic

/**
  * @jsx h
  * @jsxRuntime classic
  */

Also, allow pragmas to be anywhere in the comment, including surrounded by unrelated text.

// Unrelated text @jsx h Unrelated text @jsxRuntime classic

/**
  * Unrelated text.
  * @jsx h
  * Unrelated text.
  * @jsxRuntime classic
  */

This is more liberal than Babel, which has a test specifically to outlaw placing pragmas amongst other text in a comment - this test is disabled in this PR.

Instead, we're aligning with ESBuild (ESBuild playground) which seems to allow a @jsx pragma anywhere in the text of the comment.

[overlookmotel]

• fix(transformer/jsx): fix parsing JSX pragma comments #10983 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #10983 will degrade performances by 3.51%

_{Comparing 05-12-fix_transformer_jsx_fix_parsing_jsx_pragma_comments (27a21a7) with main (287b3c3)}

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 35 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
❌	transformer[antd.js]	40.8 ms	42.3 ms	-3.51%

[overlookmotel]

❌ transformer[antd.js] 40.8 ms 42.3 ms -3.53%

I'll try to address this perf regression in a follow-up.

[Dunqing]

❌ transformer[antd.js] 40.8 ms 42.3 ms -3.53%

I'll try to address this perf regression in a follow-up.

Weird, shouldn't have any performance impact in this benchmark, as it applies when the source type is JSX. Could you investigate why this is happening?

oxc/crates/oxc_transformer/src/lib.rs

Lines 123 to 130 in 287b3c3

	if program.source_type.is_jsx() {
	jsx::update_options_with_comments(
	&program.comments,
	&mut self.typescript,
	&mut self.jsx,
	&self.ctx,
	);
	}

[Dunqing]

Merge activity

• May 12, 8:28 PM EDT: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• May 12, 8:28 PM EDT: Dunqing added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• May 12, 8:35 PM EDT: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.

[overlookmotel]

Weird, shouldn't have any performance impact in this benchmark, as it applies when the source type is JSX. Could you investigate why this is happening?

SourceType::from_path interprets .js extension as JSX, so antd.js benchmark is treated as JSX.