-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 777
fix(transformer/class-properties): private_field_count is incorrect when class only have accessor with private field
#10463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(transformer/class-properties): private_field_count is incorrect when class only have accessor with private field
#10463
Conversation
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance ReportMerging #10463 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
Merge activity
|
… when class only have `accessor` with private field (#10463) ```ts abstract class Foo { accessor prop: number = 1; static accessor prop2: number = 1; accessor #prop3: number = 1; accessor [prop4]: number = 1; private accessor prop5: number = 1; abstract accessor prop6: number; } ``` This case only has a `#prop3` private field with an accessor. Since we haven't supported transforming `accessor` yet, the `class_details.is_transform_required` is always `false` in this `class`, which caused the `private_field_count` to be incorrect. Moving the decremental part to the `pop` side so that we can make sure the `private_props_prop` can always be handled correctly.
bf23a8a to
45f8cc0
Compare

This case only has a
#prop3private field with an accessor. Since we haven't supported transformingaccessoryet, theclass_details.is_transform_requiredis alwaysfalsein thisclass, which caused theprivate_field_countto be incorrect. Moving the decremental part to thepopside so that we can make sure theprivate_props_propcan always be handled correctly.