Repository navigation
Keep an aborted AbortSignal's wrapper alive while its controller is still reachable #32777
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Jarred-Sumner
merged 2 commits into
main
from
farm/d4c260e5/abortsignal-aborted-wrapper-gc
Jun 26, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't this be if it contains the opaque root of the signal being followed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That check predates this PR and its behavior is unchanged here: the old
if (aborted()) return false;sat above it, so it was already only reachable for non-aborted signals. The diff re-indents it into theif (!abortSignal.aborted())block so that aborted signals can fall through to thecontainsOpaqueRoot(&abortSignal)check at the end, which is what the fix needs.On the question itself: gating it on the followed signal's opaque root would be stricter, but today the only producer of an AbortSignal opaque root is
JSAbortController::visitChildrenImpl(). A followed signal that is alive through its own JS wrapper, or through a native ref (timeout timer, request), is never in the opaque-root set, socontainsOpaqueRoot(followedSignal)would report false and we would collect a follower whose source can still abort it, losing its listeners the same way this PR describes, one level up. Making that precise would also needJSAbortSignalto add itself as an opaque root during marking, so I left the clause as upstream WebCore has it (same unconditional check there). It also cannot pin a follower forever:m_followingSignalis aWeakPtr, so once the followed signal dies, the follower becomes collectable again.For what it's worth, nothing in Bun calls
AbortSignal::signalFollow()today (WebCore's fetch Request signals used it, ours does not), soisFollowingSignal()is always false at runtime and this branch is inert. I can remove the unused follow machinery, or tighten the check plus add the self opaque root, in a follow-up if you want.