ci: Run ⊂ of rpm-ostree's vmcheck#771
Conversation
|
bot, retest this please |
1 similar comment
|
bot, retest this please |
|
test comment |
1 similar comment
|
test comment |
|
bot, retest this please |
|
💥 Invalid |
da93041 to
8150abf
Compare
|
So it did break the unit tests, but not vmcheck. Hmm. |
5b4dc10 to
f03bf42
Compare
|
OK, this looks good to go now. |
|
(Forgot to mention I'm resurrecting this PR from limbo) |
ci/rpmostree.sh
Outdated
| trap cleanup EXIT | ||
| make -j 8 check | ||
| # Just a subset ⊂ for now to avoid CI overload | ||
| #make vmcheck TESTS=layering-basic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's at least run test-basic and/or test-layering-basic? Otherwise, there's no point in provisioning a host too, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah the idea was to do the unit tests first. I'll can take a stab at doing those two in this PR, or do you think we should do a separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Doing it in a separate PR is cool with me! Though maybe let's drop the host provisioning in this PR then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Eh let's do it in this one. Working on it now.
|
|
bot, retest this please |
|
Hmm, the fact that we failed to log in via ssh is worrying but OTOH the current rpm-ostree PRs are going in and I verified they were using |
aae1b62 to
1518fd3
Compare
|
bot, retest this please |
dbb44e7 to
8fbcbbb
Compare
Ooh, that one again. |
|
bot, retest this please |
Aaargh, of course. |
🍾 🥂 🎆 |
411214a to
8d94e9a
Compare
This is a quick hack to get us more than unit testing, albeit indirectly. See: coreos/rpm-ostree#662
8d94e9a to
bf90ce3
Compare
|
Rebased 🏄 and squashed 🗜. |
|
Whoooo, very nice! |
This is a quick hack to get us more than unit testing, albeit indirectly. See: coreos/rpm-ostree#662 Closes: #771 Approved by: jlebon
|
💥 Test timed out |
|
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
|
☀️ Test successful - status-atomicjenkins |
This is a quick hack to get us more than unit testing, albeit indirectly.
See: coreos/rpm-ostree#662