Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(CL): Remove redundant collect incentives from withdraw logic #7747

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

AlpinYukseloglu
Copy link
Contributor

@AlpinYukseloglu AlpinYukseloglu commented Mar 14, 2024

What is the purpose of the change

This PR removes an expensive redundant call to collectIncentives in WithdrawPosition. It's somewhat surprising to me this was just sitting there, but after digging around quite a bit it really does seem redundant.

Testing and Verifying

All existing tests pass.

Documentation and Release Note

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature or user-facing behavior changes?
  • Changelog entry added to Unreleased section of CHANGELOG.md?

Where is the change documented?

  • Specification (x/{module}/README.md)
  • Osmosis documentation site
  • Code comments?
  • N/A

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the logic for handling spread factors and incentives during position withdrawals in the liquidity protocol.
    • Enhanced efficiency by removing a redundant call to incentive collection in CL position withdrawal logic.
    • Adjusted the logic to ensure proper handling before deleting positions from state.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The update enhances the efficiency of the liquidity position withdrawal process by optimizing the handling of spread factors and incentives before deleting a position, ensuring a smoother operation.

Changes

File Change Summary
x/concentrated-liquidity/lp.go Adjusted logic in WithdrawPosition to optimize spread factors and incentives handling.

🐰🌟
In the code's intricate dance,
A change brings a new chance.
Spread factors and incentives align,
Before the position's final decline.
A rabbit's touch, precise and divine.
🥕🎩

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de3b421 and ce2a70f.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/concentrated-liquidity/lp.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
x/concentrated-liquidity/lp.go (3)
  • 293-295: The removal of the collectIncentives call and the adjustment to ensure spread factors are collected before deleting the position from the state are aligned with the PR's objective to optimize the WithdrawPosition function. This change should reduce unnecessary computational overhead without impacting the functionality, as indicated by the passing of all existing tests. However, it's crucial to ensure that this optimization does not inadvertently affect the incentives collection mechanism in other parts of the system.
  • 290-303: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

While reviewing the CreatePosition function, it's observed that the function is well-structured and follows the expected logic for creating a new liquidity position. However, it's important to continuously monitor and optimize such critical functions for performance and maintainability, especially in a blockchain/DeFi context where efficiency is crucial. No specific changes are required at this moment, but consider refactoring opportunities in the future to further improve the codebase.

  • 290-303: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The UpdatePosition function plays a crucial role in managing liquidity positions. It's well-implemented, but given the complexity and importance of liquidity management in DeFi projects, it's advisable to regularly review and optimize such functions. Consider implementing additional safeguards, optimizations, or refactoring to enhance readability and performance as the project evolves.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce2a70f and eb02101.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
CHANGELOG.md (1)
  • 68-68: The addition of the entry for version v23.0.6 in the CHANGELOG.md file correctly documents the removal of a redundant call to incentive collection in CL position withdrawal logic, aligning with the PR objectives and AI-generated summary.

Copy link
Member

@ValarDragon ValarDragon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like right to me, good duplicated code catch. Not blocking this PR, but now I'm actually confused why we dont withdraw spread factors on line 271 as well then

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb02101 and b730851.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md

@ValarDragon ValarDragon merged commit 5001247 into main Mar 15, 2024
1 check passed
@ValarDragon ValarDragon deleted the alpo/redundant-inc-claim branch March 15, 2024 14:24
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants