Less alerts from claim workflow

[yury-dubinin]

What is the purpose of the change:

• Less alerts from claim workflow

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
osmosis-frontend	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 18, 2024 2:57pm

4 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
osmosis-frontend-datadog	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Sep 18, 2024 2:57pm
osmosis-frontend-dev	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Sep 18, 2024 2:57pm
osmosis-frontend-edgenet	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Sep 18, 2024 2:57pm
osmosis-testnet	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Sep 18, 2024 2:57pm

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the workflow configuration for claiming orders, specifically adjusting the cron schedule to execute at 19 minutes past the hour and removing Slack notification steps for test failures. Additionally, the select.spec.ts file has been updated to include TypeScript type annotations for imports from the @playwright/test module, enhancing type clarity without changing the underlying functionality.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.github/workflows/monitoring-claim-orders.yml	Modified cron schedule to run at 19 minutes past the hour; removed Slack notifications for test failures.
packages/web/e2e/tests/select.spec.ts	Added TypeScript type annotations for BrowserContext and Page in import statements.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/monitoring-claim-orders .yml (1)

Line range hint 10-45: Consider alternative monitoring and alerting mechanisms for critical failures.

The removal of Slack notification steps from the fe-claim1-tests and fe-claim2-tests jobs aligns with the PR objective of reducing the number of alerts generated during the claim workflow process.

However, it's important to ensure that critical failures are still communicated to the relevant stakeholders. Consider implementing alternative monitoring and alerting mechanisms to maintain visibility into the health of the claim workflow without overwhelming the team with notifications.

Also applies to: 48-83

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef5f6db and 16abe21.

Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/workflows/monitoring-claim-orders .yml (1 hunks)
• packages/web/e2e/tests/select.spec.ts (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• packages/web/e2e/tests/select.spec.ts

Additional comments not posted (1)

.github/workflows/monitoring-claim-orders .yml (1)

6-6: Verify the reason for changing the cron schedule.

The cron schedule has been updated to run the workflow at 19 minutes past every hour, which reduces the frequency compared to the previous schedule of every 45 minutes.

Please provide clarification on the specific reason for choosing this schedule. Is it to avoid conflicts with other workflows or to align with specific business requirements?