-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Render busways #308
Comments
Does anyone have any city maps of Pittsburgh, or other cities with busways, that could be a useful inspiration for going beyond a simple service road depiction? |
I found a couple that I posted in Slack starting from about there, but my collection doesn’t include many recent city-scale maps, so I’m also eager to see examples from others’ collections. |
There are some transit maps of Seattle prior to the removal of buses from the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel but those wouldn't really fit the style of this project so I won't bother linking them... One idea for rendering would be placing a generic bus icon along busways to denote that they're only used by buses. If/when we start rendering specific transit routes then additional route numbers/shields could be placed alongside this "access" icon. |
In #318 we're toying with the idea of using purple as a generic color for public transportation infrastructure. Perhaps in that vein we could take whatever we're using for |
Guided busways ( |
My first impression is that for an American style, these two tags should be rendered identically. Bus guideways are pretty rare in the US, and I don't know if the average American user would care about the difference. An overpass search reveals scattered use, but quick inspection reveals many of these don't look like true bus guideways. Some appear to be busways tagged for the renderer (i.e. for Carto), or simple bus turnarounds that might better be tagged as service. Then again, rendering them slightly differently could provide mapper feedback... |
I think for version 1 we shouldn't worry about styling guided and unguided busways different. They're relatively rare, and I can't think of a region where both types are present. Though we could just render unguided busways for now, and copy the styling over to guided busways once those are supported in OpenMapTiles. |
The criteria for what counts as a busway according to the documentation on the wiki are quite stringent, so I am curious to investigate how well the existing usage of the tag in the US (and potentially elsewhere) actually complies with it. I know at least locally I've never had an opportunity to use the tag even for physically separated, designated roads for buses because something disqualifies each of them. It might be that cyclists and pedestrians are allowed to use them between bus arrivals, that they connect to a road with a mixed traffic main carriageway, or even just that they still have to pull over from the main carriageway into a bay where the curb is on dedicated bus service ways. Depending on what these networks look like, it may make sense to apply an even broader grouping that includes tags like bus=designated in addition to the ones mentioned above, especially if rendering busways results in isolated stretches of busway for which the connectivity isn't clear. Bus lanes parallel to the roadway are much more common in the US, and I would guess at least some of what is mapped as a busway merges with these despite the wiki advising against this. It's a little tricky to know at what zoom level and how a parallel bus lane would be rendered, but some kind of matching purple padding on roadways with bus lanes could help illustrate complete networks of separate ways and lanes exists without leaving seemingly isolated bus loops in places. This could also make it easier to distinguish the difference between ways which link dedicated lanes along main roads (common in downtowns), and ways which branch of directly from a main carriageway with mixed traffic (like school dropoff loops for buses). This tool is a pretty good visualizer of bus lanes and various versions of bus-designated roadways that could be helpful for seeing what kind of ruleset would work for "busways" (including not really busways by the strict definition), and whether or not rendering parallel bus lanes in conjunction with them would be a good idea. https://zlant.github.io/bus-lanes/#13/39.3077/-76.6186 |
Guided busways tracked separately in #413. |
Busways, often parts of bus rapid transit systems, are roadways dedicated solely to buses and physically separated from other traffic. These are tagged as highway=busway, a relatively new tag, approved in April 2021. The tag has quickly gained popularity, rising to >5000 uses, though it has been hampered by lack of rendering in OSM-Carto. In the US, such busways have existed for decades (e.g. in Pittsburgh), but are becoming more common, and now exist across the country:
An easy initial approach would be to render them identically to service roads. This seems appropriate, as the busways don't form part of the regular road network, but they are important for orientation, as the map appears to have "gaps" without them:
Due to their importance, it might be good to have them render at an earlier zoom level than other service roads. Once access tagging is developed (#216), rendering similarly to roads with access=private is probably appropriate.
These busways will be more important once more public transport features are rendered. It might be nice in the future to use colors/styles that are in harmony with bus stops, or even with railway features (#101). But I think getting it on the map in some way and refining the rendering later is better than not rendering it at all.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: