NO-ISSUE: Fix wrong pull secret file path in refresh-after-snapshot.sh script - #210
Conversation
|
@ori-amizur: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 28 minutes and 58 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: osac-project/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe script ChangesPull Secret Path Resolution
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Security & Impact Note: This change shifts from an absolute hardcoded path to a working-directory-relative path. Severity: Medium. Risk: If the script is invoked from an unexpected working directory, the pull secret will not be found, causing image preflight checks and subsequent image pulls to fail—a potential availability impact. Mitigation: Verify that all call sites execute the script from a consistent, expected working directory, or document the required execution context clearly. Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 10 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (10 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@scripts/refresh-after-snapshot.sh`:
- Line 178: The PULL_SECRET path is built from the caller CWD
(PULL_SECRET="$(pwd
-P)/overlays/${INSTALLER_KUSTOMIZE_OVERLAY}/files/quay-pull-secret.json") which
breaks when the script is run outside the repo; change it to anchor to the
script's directory: compute the script directory using BASH_SOURCE (e.g. assign
a variable like script_dir by resolving dirname of "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" and pwd
-P) and then build PULL_SECRET from that script_dir +
"/overlays/${INSTALLER_KUSTOMIZE_OVERLAY}/files/quay-pull-secret.json" so the
lookup is independent of the caller CWD; update any references that use
PULL_SECRET accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: osac-project/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: ac9de490-ffd5-4dd2-9fc2-783b2f6a6f01
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
scripts/refresh-after-snapshot.sh
|
/lgtm |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: omer-vishlitzky, ori-amizur The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
Summary by CodeRabbit