Repository navigation
Conversation
|
@jhernand: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (30)
WalkthroughThis pull request consolidates the Helm chart directory structure from Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
The service chart was nested under `charts/service` alongside other supporting charts. Since it is the main chart of the repository it deserves a dedicated top-level `chart` directory, which also makes the path shorter and more conventional for single-chart repositories. All references have been updated accordingly in the publish workflow, integration test tooling, unit tests, chart README, and authentication documentation. The yamllint exclude pattern in the pre-commit configuration has also been adjusted to cover the new path. Signed-off-by: Juan Hernandez <juan.hernandez@redhat.com>
a96cb95 to
ebee590
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhernand The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
PR needs rebase. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@jhernand: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Summary
charts/serviceto a top-levelchartdirectory,giving the main chart a shorter, more conventional path for a single-chart repository.
README, authentication documentation, and pre-commit configuration.
Test plan
ginkgo run -r internal-- all 52 suites green).Summary by CodeRabbit