Complete Cartis Roberts benchmark set

[segsell]

Complete the Medium-Scale Test Problem Set by Cartis & Roberts.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #435 (d82778d) into main (bea7abb) will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #435      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.05%   92.94%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         250      249       -1     
  Lines       18597    18311     -286     
==========================================
- Hits        17305    17019     -286     
  Misses       1292     1292              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...c/estimagic/benchmarking/get_benchmark_problems.py	93.00% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️
src/estimagic/benchmarking/more_wild.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[timmens]

A few notes:

1. Q: Do we still need this warning in get_benchmark_problems.py?

   def _get_raw_problems(name):
    if name == "more_wild":
        raw_problems = MORE_WILD_PROBLEMS
    elif name == "cartis_roberts":
        warnings.warn(
            "Only a subset of the cartis_roberts benchmark suite is currently "
            "implemented. Do not use this for any published work."
        )
        raw_problems = CARTIS_ROBERTS_PROBLEMS

2. Q: Do we still need this line in pyproject.toml?

   [tool.pytest.ini_options]
   filterwarnings = [
   # ...
   "ignore:Only a subset of the cartis_roberts",
   # ...
   ]

3. Note: Benchmark runtime with scipy_lbgfsb:
   

[timmens]

This is a fantastic PR 🎉 . Thank you a lot!

Note: In the future, we will try to capture code-coverage of jitted functions. I have opened an issue accordingly: #447